Current:Home > ContactChainkeen Exchange-A city’s fine for a profane yard sign about Biden and Trump was unconstitutional, judge rules -×
Chainkeen Exchange-A city’s fine for a profane yard sign about Biden and Trump was unconstitutional, judge rules
Indexbit View
Date:2025-04-10 09:57:44
NASHVILLE,Chainkeen Exchange Tenn. (AP) — A federal judge has ruled that a Tennessee woman has a constitutional right to post a yard sign with profane language condemning both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump.
Julie Pereira set up a sign in her front yard saying “F--- ’Em Both 2024” — except, uncensored. The city of Lakeland, a northeast suburb of Memphis, then fined Pereira hundreds of dollars for violating its regulation against obscene content on signs.
She filed a lawsuit in June, saying she was so dissatisfied with both presidential candidates that she wanted a sign that “speaks simply and cogently for itself.”
U.S. District Judge Mark Norris in Memphis ruled Tuesday that Pereira’s political sign is not obscene, and the city cannot lawfully regulate people’s points of view.
“We are proud to have protected Mrs. Pereira’s right to express her political views and to have achieved a successful outcome in this important First Amendment case,” said Daniel Horwitz, Pereira’s lead attorney.
The judge’s order comes after the city agreed to a settlement paying Pereira about $32,000 for her legal fees and reimbursing nearly $700 in fines.
The city’s regulation prohibits signs with “statements of an obscene, indecent, or immoral character which would offend public morals or decency” and “statements, words or pictures of an obscene nature.”
Initially, Pereira censored her sign as local officials demanded by covering up one letter in the profane word, but within a week she removed the redaction. The city began fining her in January, so she covered up part of the word again to avoid further penalties, according to the lawsuit.
Pereira’s lawsuit said “cuss” words are not constitutionally obscene. The lawsuit — and the judge — pointed to a 1971 Supreme Court decision that overturned the conviction of a man in California who entered a courthouse wearing a jacket with a message against the draft that included profanity.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- Today’s Climate: July 14, 2010
- Why Vanessa Hudgens Is Thinking About Eloping With Fiancé Cole Tucker
- Today’s Climate: July 21, 2010
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- Benefits of Investing in Climate Adaptation Far Outweigh Costs, Commission Says
- Trump ally Steve Bannon subpoenaed by grand jury in special counsel's Jan. 6 investigation
- New York, Philadelphia and Washington teams postpone games because of smoke coming from Canadian wildfires
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- Cheap Federal Coal Supports Largest U.S. Producers
Ranking
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- InsideClimate News Launches National Environment Reporting Network
- Christian McCaffrey's Birthday Tribute to Fiancée Olivia Culpo Is a Complete Touchdown
- Pruitt Announces ‘Secret Science’ Rule Blocking Use of Crucial Health Research
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Environmental Groups Sue to Block Trump’s Endangered Species Act Rule Changes
- Offset and Princesses Kulture and Kalea Have Daddy-Daughter Date at The Little Mermaid Premiere
- Today’s Climate: July 28, 2010
Recommendation
Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
Climate Change Is Transforming the Great Barrier Reef, Likely Forever
Why did he suspect a COVID surge was coming? He followed the digital breadcrumbs
Congress Punts on Clean Energy Standards, Again
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
Today’s Climate: July 29, 2010
Many Man-Made Earthquakes in Western Canada Can Now Be Linked to Fracking
Donate Your Body To Science?