Current:Home > ContactTexas Supreme Court hears arguments to clarify abortion ban -×
Texas Supreme Court hears arguments to clarify abortion ban
View
Date:2025-04-12 23:52:14
Austin, Texas — A lawyer representing 20 women and two doctors argued before the all-Republican Texas Supreme Court on Tuesday that women have been denied lifesaving care under the state's strict abortion law as they seek to clarify what qualifies as a medical exception.
"We are just seeking clarification on what the law aims to do," said Molly Duane, a lawyer for the Center for Reproductive Rights, which brought the lawsuit.
Five women who were denied abortions under the state filed the lawsuit in March, and they were later joined by 17 other plaintiffs, including two doctors. The lawsuit, which was brought by the Center for Reproductive Rights, is believed to be the first to be brought by women who were denied abortions after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year.
Unlike other legal challenges to abortion laws, this case does not seek to overturn Texas' ban but rather to clarify what qualifies as a medical exemption. But Supreme Court Justice Brett Busby said the job of the court is to "decide cases," and not to "elaborate and expand laws in order to make them easier to understand or enforce."
Beth Klusmann, a lawyer for the state, argued Tuesday that the women did not have the standing to sue, suggesting that the women should have instead sued their doctors for medical malpractice.
Duane argued on Tuesday that because the law is unclear, the women were denied lifesaving care, and that the state's interpretation means that "women would need to have blood or amniotic fluid dripping down their leg before they can come to court."
Earlier this year, a judge in Austin ruled that women who experience pregnancy complications are exempt from the state's abortion ban. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton appealed the ruling, bringing the legal challenge to the state Supreme Court.
In August, Travis County Judge Jessica Mangrum placed an injunction on the law, ruling that the plaintiffs faced "an imminent threat of irreparable harm under Texas's abortion bans. This injunction is necessary to preserve Plaintiffs' legal right to obtain or provide abortion care in Texas in connection with emergent medical conditions under the medical exception and the Texas Constitution."
The injunction was put on hold when Paxton appealed.
- In:
- Texas
- Abortion
veryGood! (371)
Related
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- Chrissy Teigen Claps Back After Critic Says She Only Has Kids to Stay Relevant
- Kentucky ballot measure should resolve school-choice debate, Senate leader says
- Southern governors tell autoworkers that voting for a union will put their jobs in jeopardy
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Blake Griffin retires after high-flying NBA career that included Rookie of the Year, All-Star honors
- Blake Griffin retires after high-flying NBA career that included Rookie of the Year, All-Star honors
- Home values rising in Detroit, especially for Black homeowners, study shows
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Schweppes Ginger Ale recalled after PepsiCo finds sugar-free cans have 'full sugar'
Ranking
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Heavy rains lash UAE and surrounding nations as the death toll in Oman flooding rises to 18
- Genesis guitarist Steve Hackett rushed to hospital moments before his concert
- Gayle King and Charles Barkley end 'King Charles' CNN talk show run after 6 months
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Texas inmate Melissa Lucio’s death sentence should be overturned, judge says
- Caitlin Clark is No. 1 pick in WNBA draft, going to the Indiana Fever, as expected
- Low Wages and Health Risks Are Crippling the U.S. Wildland Firefighting Forces
Recommendation
McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
Massachusetts official warns AI systems subject to consumer protection, anti-bias laws
Boston Marathon winners hope victories will earn them spot in Paris Olympics
Executor of O.J. Simpson's estate changes position on payout to Ron Goldman's family
Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
Connecticut’s top public defender denies misconduct claims as commission debates firing her
Wait, what is a scooped bagel? Inside the LA vs. New York debate dividing foodies.
Kentucky prosecutor accused of trading favors for meth and sex resigns from office